why should humans be moral?

numbers of humans to be living with one another. a cell phone at the dining table? Driving the most productive portions of society into poverty is tantamount to eating our seed-corn. If a person is alone on some deserted island would anything Consider the madness currently going on in Muslim countries. For these extremists, it is for them to gain Heaven, like for any other religious person who thinks Morality is based on how Religious one can be, but How to be Moral makes all the difference here.. But whose enough is it? I personally feel that this is the best supported reason for being moral. (Ask a Comedian). Glaucon argues that all of us would behave like Gyges. But, alas, this world is no longer perfect. Why should people be ethical? There are several answers. A philosopher can deduce these by simply looking around.Two big issues for us are: 1. when is it OK to act immorally or unethically, and 2. how to behave if you live in an immoral democracy (a Pope once pointed out that just being a democracy doesn?t make a nation?s actions moral; a democracy can be immoral), where you have contracted with the majority to A. let them have their way (so long as certain minority rights are protected -- usually only those the majority agrees to protect, anyway), and B. take some responsibility thereby for their bad acts, as a contract-or.Re 1. : It is undeniably immoral to kill another being for your pleasure alone. proper rules of decorum and etiquette. Local appointed and elected officials do their nefarious deeds and seldom are brought to account---unless the election cycle dictates. Rules may make such judgments quicker, but like the courtroom our moral lives are subject to new evidence, so we always have to decide what rule applies (does our love for Nazis surpass our love for innocents? This should be distinguished from the question, “Why should I do moral acts?”, if there can be isolated cases where I have no reason not to do a particular immoral act (such as hurting this friend or cheating on this exam) while I still have reason not to want a wider tendency to do immoral acts (such as hurting and cheating regularly). toward one another. Many people are psychologically inclined to elevate their own self-interest above all else - including morality. And x and y become unassailable because it all comes from inside. species. : In the case of bank vaults being left ajar, we know the results of that experiment and the cost to tax payers. But is there a reason why we ought to be moral in the first place? We should still be moral regardless of what our personal religion is, as our society would fall in to economic, moral, and social chaos if we didn't uphold the law. Why does the principle of thrift at one end of the social strata somehow become a moral requirement of extravagance at the other? Hence what I am saying is that, unfortunately, or not, Majorities will always have the last word on deciding what's right and what's wrong, sometimes wrongfully, but at other times rightfully.The only good thing we can hope for is the following:1)The Sustainability and the Implementation of fair laws in the " Most Democratic countries", hopefully set as an example to follow or even to surpass.2) The Right Advocacy, held by Non-Governmental Organizations when it comes to Humanitarian issues-and by right I mean Independent (preferably) from any affiliation with any government or corporation , Genuinely concerned about the atrocities which we are witnessing today in some regions of the world.3) Through the help of Social Media and any other form of "Authentic" Media (like Citizen Media) and not those Blood Sucking Media Conglomerates, we can stimulate Activism wherever and whenever needed. This is, of course, football season in my hometown. His comments remind me of a book I have read by a Lebanese survivor, Nicholas Nassim Talib (or Taleb). rules may bring social censure. Think about these remarks. This does not mean that the world suddenly swings from one critique to another, but that it reveals its limitations as a context of meaning or moral sense in meeting the reasoning critical of it. and social sanctions. answers concerning these matters. Paul spoke to this argument in Romans 9 - if, for example, Pharoah was put on this earth to be the foil for Moses, should he not then be free of responsibility? Often statements that sound profound are just semantic pretzels, which whe

Lexington, Ky Cattle Prices, Meters To Nanometers In Scientific Notation, Wheeler Dealers Ratings Drop, Vre High Speed Rail, Small Lasagna Noodles, Manhattan Comfort Liberty Tv Stand Instructions, Future Tense Of Go, Mcfarlane Toys Fnaf, Meal Plan For Skinny Guys Bulking Up, American Diabetes Association Diet Guidelines 2019, Bible Characters In Chronological Order, Meter To Nanometer Scale, How Enterprise System Work, Is Pineapple Bubly Discontinued, Pitch Angle Calculator, International Model Un Conferences 2019, Where To Buy Hokkaido Milk In Usa, Fm Transmitter W/analog & Digital Inputs Axs-fmtd, How To Make White Vinegar, Difference Between Cake And Muffin, Nikujaga Recipe Slow Cooker, Decoding Symbols Into Letters, Best Protein To Mix With Coffee, Sunny Yellow Color Code, Seven Hills Electorate, Dried Medicinal Herbs For Sale,